Porn is non-essential

Don’t get me wrong. No state, no church, no prophet and no authority has any right to prohibit porn. That’s a simple libertarian principle. All I’m saying is that, from a boobastic point of view, there is no need to do porn. In our functional system it’s not about copulation, penetration, ejaculation … – it’s all about boobs.

They don’t even have to be bare and naked. There are so many projects around about (clothed) boobs in the streets, at the beach, on facebook, on youtube … . And sometimes the hidden boobfulness is even more thrilling than the explicit content. That is because your biggest organ (i. e. your phantasy) gives you a surplus of joy that reality barely keeps available. A true breastman knows pretty well the disappointment, when she’s removing that bra (cauz’ your initial phantasy was betting way to high).

If you’re a big boobs model or you’re planning to be a big boobs model and you don’t know the basics of boobology you better go back and do your homework.

Continue reading

Cybersex – confusing quantit(t)ies of boobfulness

Deutsche Übersetzung weiter unten im Text!

Home computing and internet for everybody is changing human sexuality. Looking for and dating an occasional sex partner, rituals of copulation, sexual reproduction, bearing of progeny, caring of progeny is a culturally overcome atavistic pattern of sociability. You can choose your partners and pals for many reasons apart from sexual attraction.

Whatever the msm, the church and politics may tell you: economically and sexually there is no reason in the developed world for biological reproduction no more. There is no reason for classical real-time and real life sexual interaction at all. The first time in human history relationships (e. g. between men and women et al.) have not to be led by ordinary interests.

In case you’re just producing and/or consuming cybersex without understanding that it is essentially changing yourself (and mankind), this is the perfect time to take one step back and think about it.

Okay, weil mir das wichtig ist, hier gleich noch’mal auf Deutsch: Heimcomputer und Internet für jederman verändern die menschliche Sexualität. Einen Sexpartner suchen und ein Date haben, Rituale der Begattung, sexuelle Reproduktion, den Nachwuchs auszutragen und dafür zu sorgen sind kulturell überkommene, atavistische Muster von Sozialverhalten. Man kann seine Partner und Freunde nach den verschiedensten Kriterien auswählen, ganz unabhängig von der Sexualität.

Was die msm, die Kirche und die Politik euch auch immer erzählen: ökonomisch und sexuell gibt es in der entwickelten Welt keinen Grund mehr für biologische Reproduktion. Es gibt überhaupt gar keinen Grund mehr für klassische sexuelle Interaktionen in Echtzeit und in der Realität. Das erste Mal in der Menschengeschichte können Beziehungen (z. B. zwischen Mann und Frau u. a.) interesselos sein.

Für den Fall, dass du bloß Cybersex produzierst und/oder konsumierst, ohne dir darüber im Klaren zu sein, dass dies dich selbst (und die Menschheit) wesenmäßig veränderst, ist dies der perfekte Moment, einmal einen Schritt zurück zu treten und darüber nach zu denken.

Continue reading

The miraculous Danish Boobfulness of an era

Erotic photography and videography. Legally distributed on an industrial scale. That is a relatively young cultural phenomenon. We’re talking about the late 1960s/early 1970s in Denmark, Europe. The renowned Color Climax Corporation (CCC).

Reminiscences of names like Tina og Suzanne (above), Lisbeth, Jamaican Diane, Mona, Pia, Cindy, … Birgit. No surnames. And even more nameless ones. All united in boobfulness.

Continue reading

Virginia Bell – when America was gr8

The American people voted for a President promissing to “make America great again”. I like this guy for not being too obviously owned by Wall Street. I don’t know if he will substitute the ailing American-Russian relations with trouble in China. I love him for not being PC. I have no idea if he is going to solve the problems in Syria to get in trouble with Iran again. Most of all I second his outspoken aversion to Germany’s Chancellor and her politics.

Thinking about America being great from a boobastic point of view Virginia Bell (1932-2010) comes to mind.

00001

Those were the 1950s. The USA were bursting with strengh after winning the great war. In fact the russians did most of the work. But it was the US economy that benefited largely. Boobfulness indicates fertility. Showing your big boobs indicates prosperity. Presenting your wife(‘s big boobs) is just another way of bragging that you’ve made it.

It is not coincidence that it was Bell’s husband who initiated the making of the feature film “Bell, Bare and Beautiful” (1963) to present his trophy wife to a larger audience (than before in his exotic theater). Shortly after her pregnancy Mrs. Bell was from a boobastic point of view even more impressive than ever.

To me the only 5 ft 2 tall Virginia Bell with her 48-inch bust is still the measure of boobfulness. And she was 100% real! Two decades later the plastic surgeons were taking over the place. And nowadays there is no big boobs model no more with real boobs – at least in the USA. Those were coming from Old Europe and then – after the fall of the iron curtain – from the volupteous vast of Eastern Europe.

Those females coming from Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria etc. were willing and able to show what they got. It was for the Western societies undoubtedly an enrichment. In contrast to those covered up figures for religious reasons coming in from Nothern Africa and the Middle East these days. From a boobastic point of view there is a specific difference between these two migration flows. In other words: how to assimilate with a foreign culture when you are not willing to share your very beauties?

To make America great again from a boobastic perspective simply means to make those boobs plenty, bare and real again.

Exemplis discimus …

Continue reading