The fall of the Iron Curtain set free endless ressources of boobfulness from Eastern Europe. In many cases the most amazing models literally disappeard off the face of the earth after a few shootings.
One of the most impressive manifestations of boobfulness we’ve ever seen is co-starring in one single movie from 1996.
Before the fall of the Iron Curtain porn was officially allowed in West Germany. In European communist/socialist countries – including East Germany – it was prohibited. Some of the most homey, unique, sometimes weird, productions are from the 1980s. Those were different times in another century.
A one shot wonder from that era is credited as “Peggy Bosom” in the film “Devote Society”, located in a soft bizarre niche and presumably semi-professionally shot in the basement in one of these estabishments. Haha, those dialogs underlayed with classical music are priceless 😂👍
We’ve compared the early stages of pornography on an industrial level in the Western world of the late 1960s/ early 1970s with the time directly after the fall of the iron curtain in the former Soviet Bloc of the early 1990s. Those days were in more than one way breathless, consuming and not sustainable.
In the West there was a time before that. Distribution of porn on an industrial level was still prohibited. Andy Warhols “Blue Movie” (1969) is considered the first adult movie depicting explicit sex to receive wide theatrical release in the USA. It is often forgotten that the triumph of pornography marked the end of an era: the era of the exotic dancers and topless models of the 1950s and 1960s. That was the Golden Age of photographing and filming boobfulness and like we’ve postulated the other day: from a boobastic point of view porn is non-essential.
This project is operating within the functional system of boobage. We have two basic assumptions: (i.) our particular perspective from a boobastic point of view does not represent the entire world – and (ii.): one can look at the entire world from a particular perspective.
The other day we looked back to the 1990s after the fall of the iron curtain and how the enormous ressources of boobfulness in the Slavic cultural area contributed to western civilisation. In the 2010s we’ve heard from another liberation movement in North Africa: the so called “Arab Spring”. Millions came since then across the Mediterranean to the Western world. The simple and all-important cultural sociological question is: where is their contribution to the world of boobfullness?
From a boobastic point of view, the 1980s were quite lame. In the USA silicone was all over the place. Huuge but not real. The era of the pin-up models and exotic dancers, that made America gr8, was gone won’t come back. The breathless, consuming and not sustainable 1970s collapsed when in 1981 AIDS was first clinically observed in the United States. The Japanese market was relatively closed back then.
If there was no other reason for the fall of the iron curtain, the unleashing of endless ressources of boobfullness in the Slavic cultural area was reason enough. In former socialist countries porn was prohibited. The people used to be sexually relatively active (some say, because they’ve had nothing else to do in a controlled economy). When the iron curtain fell, there were no producers and no marketing channels in the Eastern Bloc. Dutch and Japanese pornographers invaded the scenery.
Communist countries and Soviet Republics in Europe with their representative flags (1950’s). This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons.
Economically those countries of the Soviet Union and its satellite countries were failed states. Former camerapersons for state-run television, former staff of prestigious theaters, former secretaries, former nurses and former salesgirls lost their jobs and needed money. The churches were formally disempowered and sexual morals relatively free. That’s why you have permisse productions on a high-quality level from the early 1990s. It was an atmosphere of departure in society and a gold-rush mood in the industry.
Erotic photography and videography. Legally distributed on an industrial scale. That is a relatively young cultural phenomenon. We’re talking about the late 1960s/early 1970s in Denmark, Europe. The renowned Color Climax Corporation (CCC).
Reminiscences of names like Tina og Suzanne (above), Lisbeth, Jamaican Diane, Mona, Pia, Cindy, … Birgit. No surnames. And even more nameless ones. All united in boobfulness.
Remember my first post about Virginia Bell and when America was great? -Well, Europe was still real, when America already went silicone for decades. And the opening of the iron curtain was more than a wonderful piece of luck from a boobastic point of view. There’s no other person embodying this zeitgeist better, purer and more quintessential than Milena Velba (*1970) from the Czech Republic.
Must have been early/mid 2000s when I first saw her in a video. In fact I have a more intense memory of that occasion than of some encounters in real life. That says something for a strong manifestation of boobfulness in time and space.
The earliest phenomenon of boobfulness I came across, is the Venus of Willendorf, a tiny statuette of a curvy female, roughly 25.000 years old.
Then I was for a short time into that skinny type. “Burschikos” sagt man im Deutschen – die AfD-Vorsitzende wäre ein gutes Beispiel. Then I lost all erotical interests for 10.000s of years. Next thing I remember is Susie Sparks (*1961) being all over the place in the 1980s.
That was a profound manifestation of boobfulness. Just look at those vast areolas – ohmyboobness! I was impressed and started researching for similar phenomenons in the world of boobs.
And surely I made my finds …
The American people voted for a President promissing to “make America great again”. I like this guy for not being too obviously owned by Wall Street. I don’t know if he will substitute the ailing American-Russian relations with trouble in China. I love him for not being PC. I have no idea if he is going to solve the problems in Syria to get in trouble with Iran again. Most of all I second his outspoken aversion to Germany’s Chancellor and her politics.
Thinking about America being great from a boobastic point of view Virginia Bell (1932-2010) comes to mind.
Those were the 1950s. The USA were bursting with strengh after winning the great war. In fact the russians did most of the work. But it was the US economy that benefited largely. Boobfulness indicates fertility. Showing your big boobs indicates prosperity. Presenting your wife(‘s big boobs) is just another way of bragging that you’ve made it.
It is not coincidence that it was Bell’s husband who initiated the making of the feature film “Bell, Bare and Beautiful” (1963) to present his trophy wife to a larger audience (than before in his exotic theater). Shortly after her pregnancy Mrs. Bell was from a boobastic point of view even more impressive than ever.
To me the only 5 ft 2 tall Virginia Bell with her 48-inch bust is still the measure of boobfulness. And she was 100% real! Two decades later the plastic surgeons were taking over the place. And nowadays there is no big boobs model no more with real boobs – at least in the USA. Those were coming from Old Europe and then – after the fall of the iron curtain – from the volupteous vast of Eastern Europe.
Those females coming from Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria etc. were willing and able to show what they got. It was for the Western societies undoubtedly an enrichment. In contrast to those covered up figures for religious reasons coming in from Nothern Africa and the Middle East these days. From a boobastic point of view there is a specific difference between these two migration flows. In other words: how to assimilate with a foreign culture when you are not willing to share your very beauties?
To make America great again from a boobastic perspective simply means to make those boobs plenty, bare and real again.
Exemplis discimus …